Tuesday, 1 May 2012

We woz robbed, with a capital 'R'. Blog, I kid you not!!

Dear Blog,
  Fancy a trip down Memory Lane or a quick flip up the Super Highway?
  I believe 1886 was a good year for Sauvignon Blanc, won the Grand National at Doncaster as a rank outsider at ten to one on???
~ ~ Jan 2nd The Times reported that the ‘weekly runs will be looked forward to with increasing interests [to the championships]. The muster was a good one and most of the cracks  were out.’ A.Mills and G.Harris set off 20 minutes before the pack (J.E.Hickman, E.Lewin (capt), C.Smith, W.J.Mills, A.Davoile, S.Jones, F.W.Smalley, A.Gupwell, C.Marlow, H.Davoile, C.Mortimer, J.Hewitt, W.Sharpe, F.Alexander, I.Clay and A.Tye.) ‘having sped on their way, laid about one of the finest trails they have had this season.’ [Notice the change in terminology in the next few weeks...]. H.Q. to Earlsdon Jetty, to Whor Lane cross country to Kirby Corner, plough fields to Tile Hill, left at the main road and back again via Kirby Corner, cross country to Earlsdon and home, ‘a good spin of ten miles’.
 ~ ~ Jan 9th. It was announced that the handicap from Nuneaton tom Coventry had been postponed for a few weeks, but there is no evidence of it ever having taken place. The postponement might have had something to do with the severe weather conditions. The Times reported that ‘not daunted by the frost, the handicap course was taken. the following braved the elements; F.H.Dalton (deputy capt.), A.Davoile, F.W.Smalley, A.Tye, I.Clay, W.J.Podbury, W.Sharpe, C.Daly, J.O.Mills, S.Jones, F.Alexander and W.Goddard.
 ~ ~ Jan 30th. With the Midland looming, ‘a final trail of about eleven miles over splendid hunting country, with a view to testing the pack.’ The top four (Hickman, Smith, W.J.Mills, E.Lewin) were given the bags. The pack  was A.Davoile, Williamson, J.O.Mills, A.Mills, Smalley, Gupwell, Marlow, Dalton, Clay, Jones, Podbury, Sharpe, G.Harris, Goddard, W.Lewin, M.Read, Mortimer, Hewitt, Alexander.
 ~ ~ The following week, Godiva provided 22 runners for a combined run over 8 miles with Birchfield and Edgebaston in Birmingham, although Edgebaston only managed 3 starters. Birchfield had Snook, Thornton, Savage and Slyn out so it was hardly surprising that the pace was ‘clipping’ and the field was in ‘straggling order before half the distance had been traversed. .. A large number of spectators assembled to witness the start and finish.’ where the first four were Hickman, Mills, Snook and Savage. The evening was spent ‘in harmony’ with Podbury in the chair assisted by W.W.Alexander, C.Smith and R.Hewitt from the respective clubs.
 ~ ~ Feb. 20th The club finally ‘decided to send a team to represent the city of three spires in the National Championships.’ (Times Feb. 24th) after the ‘final run prior to the championships.’ They covered 12 miles ‘with plenty of plough.’                                                                              
  Not only were the clubs like Birchfield and Godiva having varying degrees of financial difficulties, the Midland Association ‘was in want of funds’ and were helped out of the championship staging costs by Long Eaton Athletic Grounds Society who ‘came forward with a free offer of the use of their grounds for this occasion.’ The Athletic News (23rd Feb.) predicted that ‘If assiduous training and perseverance has anything to do with the result then the representative from the “City of 13 spires” (sic) may properly expect to occupy the premier position., They will come to the post thoroughly trained, and, what ever the result may be, they are certain to make a very close race.... Hickman had done very little running of late ... J.O.Mills .. great things are expected of him .... C.Smith ..is so enthusiastic in the sport .... Lewin, if he can stand the rough country, should be in the first flight .... Smalley is said to be a veritable “demon” across country’. Of the result Godiva were second (56 pts => 2. J.E.Hickman, 4. E.Lewin,11. W.J.Mills, 12.C.Smith, 13. C.Marlow, 14. J.O.Mills (Davoile ref: Times! J.O. as 30th), and also entered A.Tye, 22. A.Gupwell, Sid and 16. Sam Jones and F.Smalley, res. F.Dalton, J.Mortimer.) to Birchfield’s 33 points, the club also having the ex Moseley National champion in first . (Snook 47 mins)
   After the race the Athletic News (Mar 2nd) was rather scathing in its reporting about the Godiva performances. ‘The Godiva team cut up rather in differently .. they were, so to speak never in the hunt, the result being that they suffered a crushing defeat.. the Coventry men were some what over trained..’. As to the race ‘The Coventry lad stuck to the National champion in the most persistent manner, but when about a mile from home, the “Little Wonder” tested the Godiva representative the utmost degree, and though the latter put forth every effort, he was unable to respond when the vital time arrived, and Snook commenced to rapidly draw away, and was never again in danger of being collared, finishing up as fresh as paint about 100 yards in front of Hickman.’. The Sporting Chronicle commented that ‘W.J.Mills and C.Smith .. showed symptoms of staleness, the result of too much training. Hickman ran as he always does - brilliantly, and with excellent judgment. E.Lewin also showed better form... C.Marlow turned up a trump card [for his fine run].’ (Mar 2nd) 10 teams and 98 runners started in ‘glorious weather to cover the two laps of stiff country interrupted several times by the windings of the river Erewash.’ (Times Mar 3rd)
Note in  passing that J.Birch (Walsall) was 6th In the ‘82 race, he had finished one behind Hickman. After the Hickman’s terrible misfortunes of the ‘90s, it was his friend Birch who was to help out.
 ~ ~  Mar. 5th Godiva finally got their act together and  fielded a team. in the National Cross Country Championships. (see accompanying article). It was noted in the National sporting press that Godiva was the only team made up of local runners!! (‘Sport and Play’) 6 teams ran at Croydon, Godiva  2nd team (63 pts=> 1. J.E.Hickman, 5. C.Smith, 6. E.Lewin, 10. W.J.Mills, 18. A.Devoile, 23. C.Marlow non-counters 26. A.Gupwell, ?? J.O.Mills) with Birchfield 1st (50 pts).
        
National Cross Country, Croydon Racecourse
  The morning which promised a fine and glorious day failed to keep that promise (writes our own reporter), and heavy clouds obscured a view of that stranger to London “Old Sol”. One of two things was certain, rain or snow, and, according to the general opinion expressed, it was about evens on either, and not above   against the pair coupled. But with that cheerful characteristic of the jolly paperchasing dawg, it was evident that what ever the weather the race would not suffer much from it, ......Fortunately or unfortunately, from whichever point of view it is taken, permission could not be obtained to run across country, and consequently the whole of the race was run round the [race] course, seven laps being compounded; the runners being visible the whole time, so that though from a cross-country point of view, it was unfortunate that the committee were unable to run part of the race upon adjoining land, still from a spectator’s view it was just the thing. As usual the bookmakers were in fair force. Snook being installed at evens, whilst as much as 4’s, 5’s, and 6’s were obtainable about Hickman. At length the runners were marshaled at the starting point, and T. Shore, the president, having given the word to go, Snook immediately went away, being followed by Coad (the Southern champion) Hickman and Mabbut, (2nd and 3rd in the Midland) with several of the Birchfielders in close attendance. Finishing the first lap Snook was leading , but when another circuit had been wiped off, Hickman held the post of honour but was deprived during the following lap, the South London pet then making the pace. Hickman, Snook and Mabbutt, however, repeatedly troubled the leader, and when another lap had been completed, Coad was done for and Hickman went to the front, being closely followed by Snook, Mabbutt being third, Savage and Thorton being well up at this point of the race; and shortly afterwards Alexander, having an attack of the “stitch,” dropped out and coached the (Birchfield) team. Snook went up to the leader several times, but could never hold him, and ultimately, after a good finish, the Godiva cum Birchfield man won by 30 yards, about 100 yards separating Mabbutt from Snook. Coad came in next, but was over a minute behind the winner. Lewin and Smith of Godiva were next in and then came Savage and Thorton. Slynn and Wright completed the “Stag” half dozen, arriving 14th and 15th respectively.           
Men:
1. J.E.Hickman (God) 54m 48s, 2. W.Snook (Bir) 54m 55s, 3. A. Mabbett (Bir) 55m 29s, 4. W.H.Coad (S.L.H.), 5. C.Smith (God), 6. E.Lewin (God), 7.G.Savage (Bir), 8.T.Thornton (Bir), 9. S.V.Gannon (Liv), 10. W.J.Mills(God), 11.G.H.Bannister (Liv), 12. P.Shay (Liv), 13. G.Pennington (Liv), 14. G.Slynn (Bir), 15. S. Wright (Bir), 16. E.Maccabe (Liv), 17. H.Humphries (Bir), 18 A.Davoile (God), 19. H.Looman (S.L.H.), 20. F.W.Monk (Black).  
Team: 1. Birchfield 49. 2. Godiva 63. 3. Liverpool Harriers 82.

            This contemporary report, which appeared in the popular magazine of the time ‘Sport and Play’, only scratched the surface of events that were to have such a devastating effect on the lives of two men, one man being ruined, and the reputation of the other tarnished for a number of years. And the satisfaction of winning a Championship Team Trophy for one athletic club was delayed for nearly eighty years!!  A century after the Birchfield-Godiva struggle of 1886,  newly uncovered documents have enabled that tarnish reputation of one athlete to be rightfully restored to it’s former glory but have not fully resolve the suspicion of a cleverly sprung double bluff by the other runner.
                  The time when these events started to unfold was the Monday evening before the National Cross Country Championships which were to be held the following Saturday at Croydon. The place was the pleasant surroundings of Anderton’s Hotel in London’s Fleet Street. The main business of the meeting was to scrutinise and ratify the arrangement for the race in five days time. The nitty gritty of the various official posts were confirmed quickly, as was the  item to do with a  new medal design. But everyone knew what the main business of the evening was to be. Following the bad feelings generated from the previous two years’ championship races, the club delegates were waiting for the expected conflict to erupt when the scrutinizing and confirming of the various team members began. The assembly was not disappointed, when Liverpool’s resentment of the recent past boiled over with their objection to the inclusion of Snook in the Birchfield colours. As the only northern club present, they were aware of the uphill struggle they faced with their lodging of an objection, but felt justified in referring to the new ruling on first claim qualification. Less than twelve months on the statute book, this was it’s first test of any substance.  It was questionable whether the argument put forward by the reigning champions would successfully sway the support away from the 1885 individual National Champion. It was openly acknowledged that the Northern club were ‘acting quite within their rights by lodging an objection’ but it seems to have been suggested ‘behind the scenes’ that as Bannister and McFee were included in the Liverpool line up, then ‘people in glass houses should not throw too many stones’!!! So, ‘after some amount of discussion over the entry of W. Snook on behalf of Birchfield,’ compromise prevailed and ‘.... with the consent of the meeting (it was) withdrawn.’.
  The bad blood existed because of the athletic authority’s lack of policy in the sport regarding club allegiance. Until the recent ruling on ‘First Claim Qualification’, an athlete could chose to run for which ever club he wished. The club who could offer the best inducements, generally got the best team. This switch between teams even took place in the dressing room immediately prior to a race. It was far from an unusual practice. The Godiva Harrier Captain, Sam Jones, switched to Birchfield twenty minutes before the start of the 1883 Midland Cross-Country Championship, ......and then appeared to have been somewhat miffed the following week, when he was thrown out of Godiva! Poaching was not the sole preserve of the national scene either. At local level, clubs helped smaller outfits in the same city to prosper in the certain knowledge that they could cream off the best runners when it suited. In Coventry, Godiva members made no bones about being ‘a member of four of these (other clubs). When we got a good runner, we got him to join Godiva’. Eve of race poaching became so bad in 1984, that Liverpool withdrew from the National Championships as a matter of principle because  Moseley (a Birmingham based club) had two Godiva men, Flyer Hickman and C. Smith, plus Carter of Bristol and Finchley Harriers, while Birchfield also had two Godiva men.’ (E.Lewin and W.Mills).
  In 1885, Liverpool, employing the maxim ‘if you can’t beat them, join them’,  ‘played the same game and beat Birchfield Harriers’ with a closing score of 41 points to 49. This, inspite of the fact that the Stagbearers were able to mop up the free agents caused by the disbanding of the all conquering Moseley Harriers. Even the talent of  Arthur Mabbett, who was to be third in the ‘86 National, was not enough to swing the result the Midlanders way!  This time, it was the turn of Godiva and South London Harriers to walk away in disgust!
  So in 1886, with Godiva as unexpected starters in the Championships, there were wrongs to be righted and old scores to settle. Smoldering from defeat in the committee room because the new First Claim Rule could not be brought successfully to bear, certain factions left the pre-race meeting less than happy..
  But the feelings of injustice were certainly strong enough to continue the battle both on the Race Course of Croydon and afterwards, in the committee rooms where decisions were taken which had those far reaching effects on the future lives of the gold and silver medal winners.                                                                                               
 After the race, the knives were being honed before the protagonists had time to scrape the mud from their spikes. A newspaper reported that ‘the chief topic of conversation after the race was whether Snook could not have beaten Hickman had he wished to’. A contemporary was to write years later about the National that ‘..(Hickman) was objected to for not completing the whole of the course’ and Billy Snook stood down for him’. The same writer reinforced his belief with the widely held view that Hickman was party to a fixed result because ‘ Flyer did not get his Gold Medal till over 20 years afterwards’. Changing room speculation centred on the common knowledge that  ‘Snook gambled very heavily’ and the quoted odds meant that a killing could have been made. Two weeks later the bomb shell really burst with the formal expulsion of Billy Snook. The Southern Counties would not accept the runner up’s excuse that his feet were badly cut and ‘he was entitled to help his team mates’. The A.A.A. backed the Southern’s decision. With little right of appeal, or any chance for the ordinary athlete to overturn harsh decisions, the die was cast for both athletes. Dwindling public interest and  the passage of time meant that the goings on of 1886 only had a lasting effect on the first two National finishers and interestingly the first two teams. (cf. footnote.)  Snook was subsequently given a life ban, and although he tried unsuccessfully to compete in the professional ranks both in England and in France, he spent the rest of his life in penury and died  in the workhouse at Highcroft Hall, Birmingham in 1916 at the age of 56.  
 Flyer Hickman was not left untainted. There was innuendo that ‘Flyer’ was involved in some way, after all, the argument seemed to run, he had competed in the previous Nationals in the colours of Birchfield and Moseley. These doubts were, unbelievably, still simmering when, in the 1940s, Eric Kennell, a Coventry Godiva Harriers Committee member, wrote the first history of the club. Unable to find conclusive definitive answers to some of these old allegations, Kennell politically never mentioned them in his article about the club which appeared in the ‘Coventry Evening Telegraph’ on December 23rd. 1943. Mr. Kennell relied heavily on the writings of W.J.Harris, known by the Midland Daily Telegraph readers under the pseudonym of ‘The Historian’. The journalist seems to have written with a liberal use of poetic license over a period of more than a dozen years, as he slowly polished and refined the story of the events of not only about the formation of the Coventry Godiva Club in general, but the events of 1886 in particular. Subsequent letters to Kennell were typed up in prĂ©cis form for further reference, but facts were omitted either accidentally, or perhaps because of the pressures of the War effort, were totally forgotten.
   As Coventry Godiva’s centenary approached in 1979, there was an aborted attempt to up date the Club’s history and an appeal went out for information about the club. The history was never written and all the old materials were put in a cardboard box with other club ‘rubbish’ and left to gather dust, much presumably lost or in someone’s loft?
  With the diamond jubilee of the Coventry club imminent, some of the old records have been examined. And amongst that rubbish were some gold nuggets, including letters from contemporaries of the events of 1886, clearly stimulated by the ‘43 newspaper article. The crown jewels were in the form of a series of increasingly confidential letters from ‘Flier’ (sic) Hickman’s friend and best man at his wedding. Slowly the writer, over a period of weeks, went from the formal stiff correspondence to the friendly letters of one wanting to share his knowledge of past wrongs but still requesting that Godiva’s dirty linen need not be washed in public. Perhaps Mr. Kennell was honouring this request by his omissions and lack of follow up articles.
  The letters firstly rubbished the idea that Hickman was involved in any way. All other contemporaries with few exceptions, as well as press reports mentioning ‘Flyer’,  described him as ‘a honest man’ or ‘a man of integrity' and ‘a very charming man of very high character’.  Even one primary source suggesting skullduggery, says in capitals ‘I COULD BE MISTAKEN’ and requesting that his facts be confirmed or denied by other contemporary club members.
  The accusation that Hickman cheated by hiding behind a bush, was obviously a non starter, as the press reports of the time, clearly assert that the race was on a race course and visible for the whole time by the spectators. One of the letters to Mr. Kennell points out that the athletes had to run each lap next to, but inside, ‘the white rails of the horse circuit. There was no vegetation on the course’. The fact that Hickman never showed his medal to anyone for years fueled speculation of dishonesty inspite of the fact that ‘all the medals were presented after the race.’ . Quite simply, ‘Flier got into “low waters” and Tommy Birde of Walsall lent him money on security of his medals. He got that medal back, some years after. And that is why he never had it for years.’ .[The writer is obviously confusing the comments from the 1887 National!]              
  In the newspaper report in the following week’s sports press following the ‘86 National, it stated that ‘considering the state of Snook’s feet, and the general heaviness of the course, it must be granted that he ran well, but, despite all opinions to the contrary, I certainly think that he was only second best man upon the day of the race’. Freddie W.Smalley, Hickman’s team mate confirmed the shocking state of Snook’s feet, but wrote sixty years later, ‘I was talking to Flier H. in the dressing room when Billy Snook came up (you must understand that a fortnight previous at Long Eaton, Snook beaten Flier in the last fifty yards in the Midland event), Snook said that he was not exactly well and ask Flier if he could beat Coad, the Southern Champion. To use his own words he said, “why I should think so”. “Very well then you can win” and he did so by nearly 40 yards. No man in England could have beaten him that day.’.
  Coupling together the newspaper report of that Midland Championship Race, which did comment on the fact that ‘the Godiva man did look heavy legged and over trained by about a fortnight.’, the fact that Snook had a huge 200 yard victory and the fact that he was victorious over Hickman the previous year, had the obvious effect of lengthening the odds given for a Godiva man’s victory, making them look extremely attractive to  the eyes of a gambling man.
    Events seem to have exonerated Hickman of any wrong doing. He retained his title the following year and ran for Godiva for another ten years. But we are left to wonder if Snook’s unprecedented appearance and conversation in the Godiva dressing room before the race with witnesses present, was a carefully calculated double bluff.
       After more than 110 years, we are unlikely ever to know.  



An interesting footnote to the events of 1886 
               Godiva could justifiably claim that they were denied their rightful Championship Trophy and set of National Cross Country winners medals for first team place.
               In the team event for 1886 National Cross-Country,  Birchfield lifted the team award with 49 points to Godiva’s 63. However, Bichfield’s last counter was actually 15th, but with the Stagbearer’s disqualification, the 17th finisher, H.Humphries should have been promoted into the team to become their last counter. With Snook’s elimination the new calculated total for Birchfield would have been 58 points but the new Godiva total would also have become 58!!! It should be noted that the count back rule used in modern day championships, had not yet been introduced and the result should have been declared a TIE. (As happened subsequently in 1892* and 1897)

          The Southern Counties, with the A.A.A backing, decided to let the result stand.

 The actual and comparable theoretical results were:-
Birchfield:                                                       Godiva:
     W.Snook                     2    (sus)                         J.E.Hickman               1     (1)
     A.Mabbett                   3    (2)                           C.Smith                       5     (4)
     G.Savage                     7    (6)                           E.Lewin                       6     (5)
     T.Thornton                  8    (7)                           W.J.Mills                    10    (9)
     G.Slynn                     14  (13)                           A.Davoile                   18   (17)
     S.Wright                    15  (14)                           C.Marlow                    23   (22)
     H.Humphries       17(n/s) (16)
            TOTAL             49   58                                      TOTAL             63   58

  This should have been Godiva’s first set of gold medals. But they were denied and had to wait nearly ninety more years before they could unquestionably claim their first English National Cross Country title!!

An interesting footnote: Writing in the National press as part of an obituary to ‘Flyer’ Hickman  in 1927, W.J.Harris, who wrote under the pseudonym ‘Historian’ for the Midland Daily Telegraph, observed that ‘had the Coventry contingent run for them, they would have had eight in the first nine to finish.’ indicating that Mabbett, Savage and Thornton were also Coventry residents. What about Liverpool’s********? (See end note)
  notes ...had 7 circuits to do, 59 starters, a little under 10 miles....
 ~ ~ April 21st  Settle dies Bicycle and watch manufacturer ...first Hickman boss...
*****form mar 17th to may end nothing in the Times and ed.****
 ~ ~ June 10th. Cardiff Bicycle and Tricycle Club:- *mile cycle: 1. E.Oxborrow(120)=> 4m 20s????check*** 5 mile cycle: 2. E.Oxborrow. *mile safety: 1. E.Oxborrow. *2 mile tricycle: 1. F.W.Allard(100), 2. Henry Sturmey(180).
 ~ ~ (Times June 16th.) On June 14th an announcement that the new track was opening ‘best four lane track in the country.’ then ‘The track was in such a condition that Howell and Wood both declined to run upon it last year, and often such a palpable protest and being convinced that an improvement was necessary, the committee in charge set about effecting the construction of a path which would be free from objection. it was re-laid, widened, and banked, corners have been obviated as far as possible, ...and it is claimed to be one of the fastest and best four lap paths in England .. the seat of the cycling trade ought to hold a more prominent post in the cycling world.’ Certainly in the press through out the summer months there were repeated reports of Coventry man Howells making attempts on a whole variety of the professional world records at the track in Leicester. It was big business. Advertisements, like the one on June 9th in the Times, stressed that the meeting was on the new track and that ‘The improvements effected by raising the track at the corners has placed it amongst the best paths in the kingdom and the prizes offered have had the effect of inducing some excellent entries.’ The meeting was held to ‘celebrate the opening of a practically new track’. In the event, despite ‘the unfavourable weather, the absence of the best known racing men and the slight errors of omission on the part of the committee’ , the Times declared the meeting ‘a success.’ especially as 4 prizes were given for each competition. (Judges .A.Rotherham and Rev. G.Cuffe, referee S.Golder, handicapper A.A.Alexander, starter J.Godsell and W.Wareham(prof.) clerk C.Wareham) The committee was basically the cricket and football clubs of the city.:- *120y hcp(4h): hts J.Payne(4)=>> 13s, J.Lucas(4)=>> 13.2s,  W.J.Podbury(3)=>> 12s {3f}N.B. also W.H.Hayward(4½), J.Williamson(scr) (as Birch), J.Hewitt() (Melbourne H.), T.Humphries() (Melbourne H.) unpl. *440y hcp(3h): hts. T.H.Dalton(16) (Stoke Harriers) =>> 59.6s {4f}, J.Steer(17)=>> 58.6s {3f} *mile hcp(28e,20s): 1. E.Gupwell(120), 3. W.J.Mills(45), 4. I.Clay(90) (Chey C.C.) ‘won as he liked’.
 ~ ~ June 12th Nuneaton Cricket Ground (5000 spectators):- *mile hcp: 1. J.E.Hickman(30) 2. F.Mills(110) (Astley) *½ mile hcp: 1. J.E.Hickman(16) [2. J.D.Johnson(25) (Chester Tally Ho)]. All competitors were local, one is left to put two and two together when questioning why Hickman ran here when there was the big meeting in Coventry.
      Another Godiva man marries, Tom Percy Yardley.(Tues 23rd June ck if married or died
 ~ ~ ?? Meeting was ‘promoted by the city’s cycle manufacturers and other gentlemen’ Most events were cycle races, but one is left to wonder how many of these gentlemen were also involved in the original track venture eight years before:- 120y hcp: ‘only two finished, W.J.Podbury(3½) ‘did not cross the line’ Things were no going Godiva’s way .. ‘J.Williamson(1) dead heated, but lost out on the rerun with James Askew(10) (Hillfields Rovers F.C.), J.Lucas(4½)=>>12.4sec {1f=>>21.2sec} *mile hcp(20e,11s): 3. J.E.Hickman(scr) ‘three finished’.
 ~ ~ July 24th Foleshill Sports. (handicapper William Hosier, judge Dr. Orton, referee S.Golder) :- *250y hcp(3h): 1. J.Lucas(7)=>>27sec. 2. J.Williamson(scr) 3. W.J.Podbury(5) ‘finished so closely that they were with difficulty placed.’ 120y hcp: 1. J.Carpenter(8) (Fol)=>>13.4sec 2. W.H.Cowley(4) [winning a copper kettle] *½ mile hcp(22e,20s): 1. J.Hewitt(60) [silover lever watch £4] 2. A.Tye(60) [10/- cutlery] 3. J.E.Hickman(scr) leading with 50 yards from finish but fell over a peg but pluckily finishing took third’. *mile hcp(18e,13s): 1. W.J.Mills(70)=>>4m 32sec. 2. T.Woodward(145) (Stoke) 3. E.Lewin(75) 4. A.Tye(145) *2 mile hcp(15e,13s): 2. E.Lewin(20) 3. J.E.Hickman(scr), the first 3 men beating 10 minutes (1st Hayden=>>9m 55.4sec of Edg. H.)
 ~ ~ July 31st. Coventry Philanthropic with an 8000 crowd and the usual Coventry ‘who’s who’ in charge viz - judges Dr. Iliffe, John Herbert, Walter Turrell, handicapper H.M.Oliver, referee H.Sturmey, clerks C.Wareham, W.Lines, starter W.Wareham(prof.), timekeeepers J.H.Godsell, W.Hosier:- *mile hcp: 1. Jonathan Hewitt(150)=>>4m 33.4sec. 2. T.Woodward(130) (Stoke Harriers) 3. F.H.Dalton(115) ‘led all through’ won by 8 yards *¾ mile s/c(9h+w/j): 1. E.J.Smith(50) (Leam H.)=>>3m 36.5sec 2. Samuel Jones(45) (Sparton H.) 3. F.H.Dalton(80) ‘Won by 6 yards’. I.Clay(75) became ‘a little bit lame, therefore retired’. *440y hcp: hts. J.Williamson(8)=>>53.0sec {2f} Jon. Hewitt(30) *120y hcp(4h): ht. J.Payne(7¼)=>>13.2sec
 ~ ~ Aug. 14th Stoke Flower Show:- 120y hcp(4h): J.Lucas(3)=>>12.6sec. W.H.Cowley(9½)=>>12.4sec. C.F.Woodward() (Stoke H.)=>>12.8sec *½ mile hcp(27e,20s): 1. J.Hewitt(50) F.Dalton(30) 3. H.Fennell(70) (Cov) *mile hcp(25e, 22s): 1. J.E.Hickman(scr)=>>4m 31.2sec 2. J.Simpson(145) (Fol ..G.H. in obs. race!) 3. A.Davoile(95) 4. B.Colledge(140) (Brink) ‘closest finishes ever witnessed in the district’.
 ~ ~ Aug. 21st. Cheylsmore C.C. 2nd Annual Sports (mostly cycle races):- *120y hcp(4h): 1. J.Williamson(6½)=>>11.4sec. 2. W.J.Podbury(9) 3. J.Lucas(8½)  *mile hcp(31e,25s): 1. A.Tye(150) (Stoke A.C.)=>>4m 26.2sec) 2. F.H.Dalton(120) 3. T.Birch(55) (no club) ‘J.E.Hickman retired at the half mile being still in the rear’.
 ~ ~ Sept. 28th at the Coventry Cricket Ground two cycle and one flat organised by the club for the benefit of the keeper, Mr. Collier. (Timekeeper W.Hosier, handicapper S.Golder):- *mile hcp: 1. T.Woodward(10)=>>4m 56.4 (Stoke H.) E.Jones(35) A.J.Gupwell(scr) (Cov)
                         On the same day at Hinkley, the meeting still attracted entries from a wide area despite the cyclists having an ‘uneven and stiffish hill having to be negotiated’. The racing was ‘of average quality’ but the sprint ‘was as good a one as is generally seen’ (Times Sept. 1st) Of the 11 events, 6 were ‘open’:- *¼ mile hcp: 2. W.H.Venn(23) *mile hcp(18s): 1. Charles Smith(130) (Cov) =>>4m 36.0sec, the Godiva Secretary ‘only two finished’. Dalton (½ mile) and Williamson(300H) also ran. One is left to wonder how they managed to double up at the two meetings!
  The beginning of September saw the ‘Reporter’ Sports (Sept. 4th). As arguably the most sports minded paper in Coventry, it is surprising at the number of non athletic events (obstacle, donkey etc.) and the poor quality of entrants and results:- *mile hcp: W.Lewin(150)=>>4m 24.0sec *120y hcp: hts. T.Busby(12) (Warwick)=>>12.0 sec J.E.Hickman(8½)=>>12.4sec W.H.Cowley(9¾)=>>12.0sec {1f ‘a suit of clothes} *220y hcp Y<18yrs(6h): hts. J.E.Kirkman(3) (Melbourne H.)=>>24.6sec J.Athersuch(6) (Wellington H)=>>23.0sec
  On the following Monday, Rugby Cycle Club 3rd Annual Sports:- *120y hcp(6h): hts J.Lucas(5)=>>12.2sec {1f=>>12.8sec} R.Swire(8)=>>13.2sec  *mile hcp: 1. C.Smith(100)=>>4m 24.2sec 3. W.Lewin(155) *¼ mile hcp: hts J.E.Hickman(6)=>>56.4sec W.H.Venn(10) (Cov C.C.)   
~ ~ Thursday Sept. 9th. Perhaps one reason that Birchfield Harriers failed to fulfill their inter club commitments might have been the parlous state of their finances? ‘In connection with the tour of Birchfield Harriers, the object of which is to restore the finances of the club to a flourishing condition, an athletics meeting ... [drew 500 spectators, the cold wind mitigating against their enjoyment ... Most of the amateur flyers were carded, but several of them failed to put in an appearance.’ [All the top locals, amateur and professionals, were named in the pre meeting advertising!] (Times Sept. 15th):- *½ mile cycle: 2. S.H.Brown(28) *300y hcp: hts W.J.Podbury(16) {2f}, J.Lucas(16), J.E.Hickman(16) (Birchfield)=>>33.4sec. J.Williamson(10)=>>34.5sec {3f}
 ~ ~ September 18th  at the Cricket Ground:- ‘The programme was an attractive one, not withstanding that the compilers descended to the transparent device of swelling the numbers of entries by inserting dummy names - a practice which was as objectionable as it was devoid of wit.’ (Times Sept. 22nd). And that was not the only controversy surrounding the meeting, the other having far more serious consequences. Remember that Mr. W.W.Alexander was a respected handicapper and timekeeper. He was also the driving force behind the Birchfield Club. The Times continued ‘A.P.Engleheart and E.Oxborrow had entered  [the meeting] and inspite of their recent suspension by the N.C.U., they insisted on competing, though they were not recognised by the judges nor were their numbers telegraphed. As a further sage guard protests were lodged against them by other riders. In the ½ mile race, Oxborrow was put on 18 yards but preferred to ride the whole distance with the view of making a new time, and did his heat in 1m 17sec.. In the mile cycle event both Oxborrow and Engleheart won their heats and took part in the final, Engleheart finishing third but taking no prize, while Oxborrow established a new safety record of 2m 43secs.’ A week later the N.C.U. promptly suspended the five cyclists who took part in the finals as they were regarded as guilty of complicity sine die. And ‘attention was called to the fact that Mr. Alexander, the official handicapper to the Union, had read of the notification the suspension, and had, in spite of this, handicapped the riders. The secretary was instructed to ask Mr. Alexander for an explanation.' (Times Sept. 29th) This was by no means that Alexander was called to account by the authorities!!! It hardly seems credible that the events could have taken place without a nod and a wink from the officials? (Judges A.Rotherham, Dr. Aitken, referee H.Sturmey, starter W.Wareham(prof), clerks W.Seymour, R.Barton, R.Beesley, telegraph steward C.Daly, H.W.Smith, competitors stewards J.Player, W.J.Mills, hon. sec. C.Smith handicapper and timekeeper W.W.Alexander):- *mile hcp(32e,26s): 3. H.H.Davoile(150) was the only Godiva to place. But then we have the interesting members 300 yard handicap heats, note the number who must have had dual membership: ht1. R.Swire(scr.) (Weston A.C.) ‘walk over’ {3f}, ht2. C.C.Wise(9) (Leam), J.H.Brownson(15) (Hinkley), J.Williamson(1½), J.Simpson(24) ‘the pistol hung fire  and Williamson did not start, Wise won easily by five yards. Subsequently Williamson and Wise ran again, and Williamson who could have won retired amid the jeers of the spectators.’ ht3. W.J.Peel ‘walk over, ht4. J.Lucas(8) {1f=>>33 sec}, W.Steer(21), T.Birch(12) (Walsall) Ht5. E.Lewin(25), J.E.Hickman(8), A.King(15), C.Wareham(scr) (Cov. F.C.), the starter’s son! ht6. W.Lewin(35) {2f} ‘walk over’ ht7. J.M.Player(8), A.Tye(22)
 ~ ~ Sept. 25th. at Aston Lower Ground where a considerable number of Godiva members entered:- *120y hcp: hts J.Wiliamson(6¼)=>>12sec W.J.Podbury(9¾) J.Lucas(10½) (Hillfields Rovers F.C.)=>> 11.6sec {2f} *mile hcp: 2. F.H.Dalton(120) ‘narrowly beaten’ *mile hcp s/c: 3. F.H.Dalton(130)
 ~ ~ On Dec. 15th, the Times reported that ‘The combined run between Birchfield, Edgebaston and Stratford upon Avon Harriers ... turned out to be a “frost” on account of the non arrival of Birchfield and Stratford while Edgebaston were poorly represented [with 7 men] while most of the crack men of the local club were conspicuous by their absence. [E.Lewin, Sam Jones, A.Tye, F.H.Dalton, A.Davoile, W.Lewin, F.W.Smalley (whipper in) and the hares C.Seymour, J.Hewitt] The run being a slow one all kept well together until two miles from home when the visitors began ‘to warm the pace up’ and after a good finish A..Mabbett [pa Birchfielder] arrived first, E.Lewin second Sam Jones third. After the usual tubbing, about thirty sat down to a knife and fork tea.’ The harmonious evening finished with a rendition of ‘Auld Lang Syne’!
 ~ ~ On Dec. 18th the club had a handicap with W.Seymour as judge, C.Smith as handicapper, the prizes for which were presented at a smoking concert on the following Monday, Liggins presiding over the proceedings. 15 started with scratch man, J.E.Hickman coming 9th, W.Lewin (3 30), A.Davoile (2 50), and E.Lewin (0 45) taking the honours.             

Ref perf folder for individual profiles of above club memebers#
IMES FINISHED AND needs editting,and  photos in,EDS >>>>>>>>


OK OK .... so it was more like a slow boat to China     ….    Chill Blog, chill. There’s another 131 years of this stuff to go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                   Colin
PS Lord Leveson will deal with Godiva’s appeal once he has finished reading the ‘Sun’.

Sunday, 29 April 2012

Manchester Marathon result .... wet, wet, wet?

Boy was it wet this morning Blog? Or was it wet?
Yes it was, yes it was.
Pouring down with water
Pouring down with water.
Oh dear me, oh dear me.
Soaking wet, soaking wet.
Splashing round in water,
Splashing round in water.
Oh dear me, oh dear me.
This morning was the final Fun Run at the Centurions’ monthly ‘5’ mile races. My granddaughter ran the Fun Run, accompanied by her mum, who then ran and won the ‘5’!!! Amazing that so many people can enjoy themselves in the cold and wet while I am as miserable as sin. At the presentation, my granddaughter was as pleased as punch when her name was called out and she found that she had won a plaque in the Fun Run for being 3rd in the overall series run throughout the winter months; her first ever award!!!! She was dead chuffed until a few minutes later when her mum’s name was read out because she had finished second overall in the senior women’s section!!! DĂ©jĂ  vu!!! Rewind twenty years and it was like watching my kids win plaques only to find their mother had won as well!!! Of course for me, the most satisfying aspect of all this awards’ business, is not so much the fact the family have amassed a stack of medals etc. over the years, but the fact that they still enjoy the competition and the training. So what happened to all their friends who were so good when my children were small???  I’ll tell you what has happened Blog. They have lost interest; that is what has happened to them. Their friends were probably a lot better than my two, but their friends were told they were good by their parents and the club coaches, whereas my kids could train if they wanted to or not. Relaxed. No hang ups please. They were allowed to have a laugh if they wanted.
A true story Blog, I kid you not. One of the club coaches must have had a couple of dozen girls in her group. Some were talented. The coach was always so desperate to produce a successful athlete; time and record every single step they take. One particularly talented girl was told not to associate with my daughter as my daughter ‘didn’t take her athletics seriously enough’! And Blog, who is the only girl in the group still competing today???
In another life, I was interested to find out the reason (s) for the dropout rate of young females from athletics. Part of this investigation involved a series of open ended questions answered anonymously by the target group. And guess what?? Blog I kid you not …. ‘BOREDOM’ … or words to that effect. One reply put her reason quite succinctly … ‘I know what training I will be doing this time next year; the same as I was doing this time last year.’ To prĂ©cis … ‘no fun’ or ‘too serious’ were also offered as explanation. I had to go to considerable trouble to find a large enough sample of girls who had already left the sport to gain some insight. I found the results unsurprising. Observe down any club how unstructured the training set by the coaches seems to be over a given time (well to me looking in from the outside). Some athletes have been known to quip that the given session was conceived on the way down to the track. And the thought given by the great uncoached ….. ‘What are you doing tonight?’ or, for the more democratically reared, ‘What shall we do tonight?’
And now for a treat Blog ….. at last I have remembered to give you a quiz answer. An answer!!!! Are you excited Blog? Or are you excited?? .. the first of many if I remember to take my new memory pills. Ever so good they are. Really. Some bloke from Nigeria sold them to me on the computer message thing. I won a lottery at the same time. When the winnings arrive I will treat you Blog. Promise. I think I will treat myself to a pair of new running shoes now that my rib cage bones are healing so well. I got some pills for my ribs off the same bloke. …. Trudging? No way.      Jogging? Not on your life. …  Running? You’ve said it Blog.          Running with a capital ‘R’.
So
Photo no. 49:- Why is this Olympian and former world record holder shaking my hand? Or am I shaking his hand? Where were we? What was the occasion? Who is he?
The occasion was the launch of Manchester’s bid to stage the Olympic Games. It took place at Tatton Park … the launch not the Olympics!!! The athlete is Olympic bronze medallist and former world record holder for the mile, Derek Ibbotson. I first met Derek when I was 17 years old, two days after joining my first athletics club, Bingley Harriers ... and before my first Inter Club Cross Country Race. Derek ran for Longwood Harriers (which is in Huddersfield).
                                                     Colin

Friday, 27 April 2012

What to do after the London Marathon

Now Blog,
You have finished the London Marathon a year and four days ago. You are still unable to walk. What do you do? Well the house renovation needs finishing so you are inspired into action. Not true; you have been nagged for years by your wife to get the kitchen floor in the servant's quarters sorted and because you have finished the London Marathon on all fours, your resistance is low and all you want is a good sleep and a bit of peace and quiet to recover before you leap into action for your next trudge.
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
      Being a tight sod, and just supposing you were given a selection of Victorian and modern day tiles which were badly in need of renovating which most people would chuck out; different sizes, different thicknesses, different shades and just suppose you lived in an old farmhouse which badly needed renovating and just suppose you had plenty of spare time to do said renovating because your trudging was going depressingly slowly (cf above). What would you do?? Quite right Blog. You would design a kitchen floor that had all kinds of  hidden mathematical puzzles so you could use up the selection of Victorian and modern day tiles which were badly in need of renovating which most people would chuck out and so you could use up the found selection of different style Victorian tiles. Space available :-Kitchen => 12’ square. On offer:- Victorian 1½ ” thick small … post war ½” thick small … Victorian orange soft 2” thick large … very old dark red 1½” thick large … few shiny  post war large …and   fact:-  4 smalls tiles measure the same length as 3 bigs ish. The Victorian dangly kitchen light is central. 4 purple triangles, 5 purple squares to what do with? Extra old squares found under layer of lino tiles which were over modern large square reds (but most were unusable from years of wear and tear by clogs) which was over 6” of sand which was over very old orange squares some of which were useable. But the design Blog, the design?? What about a design which would not upset English Heritage when they come to list the Mansion? How to create a design?? Quite right Blog, you would go for a long trudge to work out a design …. Well two trudges actually (and of course they were just after the London Marathon from which you are tired)  And here you have it Blog => picture please James …..JAMES, I said PICTURES.

Total cost about nowt for the tiles and 15 quids for sand and cement not bad even for a tight sod? Are you impressed Blog or are you impressed? OK. Please yourself. The carpet comes tomorrow.
                                    Colin
PS Trudging last night, past a group doing efforts (repetitions), I must confess that I was forced to smile (inwardly to myself of course, one does want to lose my miserable demeanour, does one Blog?)… “The next one, I want you to do at 70% effort.” And two minutes later. “And now, I want this one to be at 80% effort”. If not mathematical then physiological nonsense???? But the coach had lots of badges … so I trudged on before I found out if the next effort was going to be at 110% effort.  

Monday, 23 April 2012

2012 London Marathon plus one day

Ok Blog, so I have calmed down a bit now. But. The selectors for our Games never fail to amaze. Going back some 50 years, two athletes were preselected for the Olympic marathon leaving one place to be fought over at the ‘trial’ where at least three runners were capable of representing GB with success. Not fair. Not fair at all. The third runner selected was Godiva’s Brian Kilby, current European and Commonwealth Champion …. But he still had to prove himself in the AAA Championships; having to grind out another marathon, a summer race in searing heat. He finished 4th in the Olympics and would probably have medalled if it hadn’t been for the idiotic pre-selection decision and the forced run off which was so close to the Games that it must have seriously hampered his podium chances. On Sunday, at least two athletes in the women’s race were capable of representing GB at the Olympic Games in London, but there was only one place available. When so many athletes are so close to selection, why do not the selectors state simply that the first three to finish earn their Games place. Everyone knows the criteria, no favourites, everyone knows when to peak for a trial, everyone toes the line with the same weather conditions, the same course, the same competition; biased media support then counts for nothing. That is what basically happened following the mess up in 1964. The procedure stood the test of time until the selectors were stupid enough to be conned into a selection procedure when athletics started to go ‘open’ and certain marathon runners could use the system by finding a ‘favourable’ marathon somewhere across the world where the pressure was off and an easy time could be posted leaving all the rest of us mugs to fight it out against the odds at the AAA Championships.
And another thing the selectors cannot sort out ….. they seem to operate two sets of criteria, have double standards. If you take a dispassionate view of the results and the times of the women’s race, the GB women are so far off the world standards (read ‘African’) that they stand little chance of a medal. That being the situation, why send THREE when the identical case can be argued that the men are in precisely the same position but only ONE will run. Are the selectors blinkered by the athletic press observations which talk up the women and how good they are in world terms but talk down the men and how bad there are in world terms. A smattering of statistical procedures shows that in mathematical terms, there is no significance difference between the medal chances of the men and the women if THREE per nation are considered; not to be blinded by red herrings that show a 150 or whatever Kenyans have achieved the ‘A’ standard for the marathon and not quite that many GB athletes have!!! Nor to be blinded by outstanding performance eons ago … time will not age us’ …oh yes it will!!!!!!!!!!
On the other hand …. how many selectors know what happens to an athlete mentally during the course of 26 odd miles? It is an experience alien to them. Jogging a marathon ain’t the same as an eyeballs marathon!!! Neither is it quite the same as 100m run me thinks, or chucking a stick about. If all our expert coaches can’t get the marathon times down to respectability (read 30 years ago), and they are supposed to be qualified to understand the marathon, what chance has a selector of knowing how a given marathon runner will perform??
                            Colin

Sunday, 22 April 2012

London Marathon 2012 Results

Dear Blog,
    Have you seen the London Marathon result?? I’ll tell you what the London Marathon result was … it was a threat to my marriage, that was what it was. A threat with a capital ‘T’. I didn’t get a cup of tea in bed. I had to make my own breakfast. I had to make my own lunch and guess who will be making my tea???? The London Marathon should NOT be shown on TV. NO. Not at all. Either that or give me a marriage settlement so that I can employ someone who will look after me in the manner to which I have become accustomed to. My wife gets up early, goes downstairs switches on the TV … and that’s it. Plugged in. A solid five hour session. Eyes bulging, agog at the screen watching clowns, elephants, rhinos etc etc etc etc.. She even asked me to make her lunch. ME? MAKE HER LUNCH!!!!!!!!!!! 40 odd years of marriage and she asks me to make her lunch. What planet is she on??????????????????????? Planet Imagination. The only consolation of this London Marathon on TV lark is that I saw no one, NOT A SOUL on my morning trudge. Will write again later when I have calmed down a little ….. and had my tea at the pub!!!
                       Colin

Saturday, 21 April 2012

IOC to ban team from London Olympics 2012?

Dear Blog,
             I told you so, I said it would happen. Inevitable. At least it wasn’t us that have been rumbled. YET.
Did you catch the BBC News this morning? If you remember when I wrote to you about the Olympic Rings, I said that the IOC was very protective of their five intersecting circles and that they took no prisoners. They won’t allow the unauthorised use of the ring symbol or any variation; prosecution will follow any abuse. They would pursue in the Courts of Law any person or organisation who takes advantage by misuse. I said we had to be very careful with our memorabilia idea; I emphasised that we had to be watchful about where we marketed our trinkets, didn’t I Blog?? Fourwarned is to before harmed. Well the crackdown has started according to the press agencies and what was on the News this morning. I told you so, I said it would happen. Inevitable.
An executive meeting of the IOC was held this morning when the subject of the Archery Competition in the Olympic Games in London 2012 was discussed at some length. The BBC News 24 reported that legal action had been taken against the Archery Association for the unauthorised use of the Olympic Rings symbol. The Archery Association have been accused of defying the two acts of Parliament which prohibits the misuse of Olympic Logos … check out the Acts if you doubt me Blog, look it up in the Dukes of Hansard. They, the Archery Association, Phil, Dan, Doris etc., have been ordered by the High Court to cease the use of the logo with immediate effect. It appears that the Archery Association has bastardised the five intersecting rings and have had the audacity to reformulate them into concentric circles so that they could be used as a target for competitive purposes.[the rings are inside each other and have been mounted on a thick straw backing, apparantly] SACRILIDGE. The competition has been formally banned from the Olympic programme for London 2012. The Rings [concentric] are no longer allowed to be used. BUT. To ameliorate the feelings of the bow and arrowers, the IOC has devised a different form of competition to overcome the loss of their target shootings, whilst still satisfying the spirit of the Games. SO. Hyde Park will be used as the new venue of the new competition. Archers of each Nation will be divided into two teams, namely, the Robins and the Hoods. Each bower will be allowed six arrows. You can tell when the game starts because an arrow will be shot at an apple and the sound of pips squeaking is the signal to commence. The winning team of each Nation will advance to the first round proper. In all Games, members of a team will be allowed to hide behind trees, but not a member of the public. 1 point will be awarded for a hit by an arrow on an opposition team member; a bonus point will be given if a serious injury is caused and bonus of two point for a kill. After 30 minutes or when all arrows of both teams have been shafted, whichever is the longer, the team which has amassed the most points will be declared the winner to advance to the next round … those hit by an arrow, including the dead, will not be allowed to compete in the next round. Pedestrians are advised not to use Hyde Park during periods when competition is taking place. If they insist in on a walk in the park, they must be aware that they do so at their own risk. Promenaders who make a habit of strolling with an apple balanced on their head are strongly advised to desist from this habit for the duration of the Games. At the present time, LOCOG have confirmed that Archery is the only Olympic Event still with a surplus of tickets. The Trail Event in Sherwood Forest, earlier in the year, ended in confusion, when Lord Coe (a right goody two shoes) was adamant that he wouldn’t stand and deliver and Little John was arrested for loitering in the bushes. Maid Marian escaped with a caution.
An Olympic Gold Medal will be awarded to the last man standing, silver to the individual with the highest points total, whether dead or alive. A Bronze will be awarded to each survivor.
Boyed on by the courts accepting that any variation of the Olympic Rings contravenes the copyright of the IOC, and the successful prosecution of the Archery Association, means that the legal advisers of the IOC are looking at the possibility of pursuing the RAF in the courts over their Logo.
                                     Colin  

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

So who is coming to town?

Photograph Quiz:
Photo no. 96:- Who is this Olympic Walker who joined Godiva? Which club was he in before he joined Godiva? In which Olympic Games did he walk? What record does he hold concerning the Olympic Games??
Dear Blog,
         Am I a bigot, Blog or am I not? I am not.
Newspapers tell a good story especially if they have a vested interest. Local radio also plays its part. The officers of local councils are paid a good salary, a very good salary. Local councils spend an awful lot of money in employing ‘advisors’ to perform various functions … save the council money through efficiency savings, select the most appropriate design for a new development within the authority, help with an  ‘overall development plan’, and so on and so forth. You know the kind of thing Blog.
Coventry is the thirteenth [or is it 11th?] largest city in the UK, I believe. You may know differently Blog?? Invariably, Coventry underperforms relative to similar sized authorities (e.g. the ‘Guardian’ survey two Saturdays ago referring to house values … Coventry did not even rank) Sport fares little better; look at the performance of the football, rugby, athletic results for confirmation, Blog.
From the announcement that London had won the Olympic Bid, the chances of Coventry benefitting from being the base of a National Team has been talked up in all the appropriate areas. Specific personnel have been appointed by the City to further Coventry’s claim for a piece of the action together with attendant staff to publicise the benefits of the City to any interested Country. The local football stadium being selected for some of the football tournament games was a tangible result but not quite the juicy prize envisage in the publicity material which has been produced in volumes over the last five years. The prospect of a high performing nation being based in the city was the carrot which was dangled in front of the citizens of Coventry.
So …. Birmingham gets the USA and Jamaica. No surprise there. Look at who is based in Loughborough. Look who is based in Manchester.
Coventry gets the wrestlers and boxers of Bhutan. Bhutan??? Now I’m not racist and I cannot claim that one of my best friends is a Bhutanian. But Bhutan?? I will welcome the Bhutanians along with the best of the rest of the citizens of Coventry, but I am sure that everyone did not expect to have to rush to an atlas with a magnifying glass to find where the nation the City was to host actually came from. The impression fostered by those doing the City’s P.R. work was that a high profile country was on its way to enjoy the facilities of both Coventry’s Universities and the City’s sports facilities.
So a lot of money spent on 5 years of P.R.. Money well spent?? If not, why not?? Prospects delivered? If not, who carries the can?? Promises fulfilled?? If not, should someone fall on their sword?? Have the City come up a little short?? If so, how short??
It depends on the viewpoint …. Is the glass half full, or is the glass half empty?? If it the glass is half full, there must be time to fill it??? Football base??? If the glass is half empty, there must be time to fill it???? Football base????
Come on Blog, use your influence!!
                        Colin